HLPS tribute to the late David Cumming

Rest In Peace – David Cumming 

David Cumming passed away on Sunday, Sept 6th 2026. He was a long-time member of the Human Life Protection Society and a beautiful, gentle soul. David was very supportive of the prolife work his wife, Joyce, was a part of and, in turn, worked very hard as a member of the State Council, defending the cause of life for over fifty years.

He was very astute as to the wiles of the politicians and could discern how to promote the pro-life cause even in a hostile context. David was a wonderful family man, and, with his wife Joyce, became a champion of family values. He was a very honest man and could anticipate the problems that could occur when dealing with all sorts of people. We send our love and support to Joyce and family.

David will always be remembered amongst the Human Life Protection Society. May he rest in peace.

David Cumming

A sombre symbol of abortion in Canberra

A rally was recently held at Parliament House in Canberra to raise awareness about the problem of abortion in Australia.

Organised by the Australian Christian Lobby, the rally included an eye-catching display created in honour of Australia’s aborted babies. The display comprised a huge cross made of knitted booties which was set up on the grounds of Parliament House, representing babies lost to abortion.

The 10,000 booties, including many which had been hand-knitted by Christians throughout Australia, were collected by members of the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) especially for the display. The ACL’s Baby Booties Campaign was begun in 2023 as a way of bringing awareness to the issue of abortion and of influencing national laws with the hope of providing greater protection for the unborn.

abortion
The cross made of 10,000 baby booties. Image courtesy of the Australian Christian Lobby.

According to the ACL press release,

“Before a single bootie was laid, we prayed. More than 1,000 of us gathered online across ten denominations, asking God to move on Monday. Then we watched Him do it. And then the media came. The Sunday Telegraph carried the story across Sydney. Radio stations from Cairns to Geelong told their listeners. Television cameras lined the lawns, and the newswires took it to local papers in every state. In two days: 169 media reports, reaching an estimated two million Australians.“

After the cross was dismantled, the baby booties were packed up to be sent to pregnancy resource centres across Australia.

Born alive after abortion

On the same morning as the cross was created, a bill known as the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026 was introduced to federal parliament by Nationals MP Llew O’Brien. This bill seeks to ensure babies who survive abortions are given medical care instead of being left to die. The bill also seeks to recognise babies who survive an abortion as legal persons.

Commenting on the bill, Michelle Pearse of ACL said,

“Whatever your view on abortion, access, or a woman’s right to choose, this is about post-birth protections and babies having the same entitlement to medical care, pain relief or palliative care as a baby born prematurely. This is about legally recognising that each of these tiny humans is a person with human rights.” 

Current abortion statistics

Although it is always difficult to get an accurate picture of abortion numbers for Australia, we have been able to find the number of surgical abortions committed in Tasmania as well as the total of chemical abortions for the entire country.

From our President, Anne Sherston:

Two years ago, I requested from Freedom of Information in Tasmania the statistics on abortions. At that time, nothing was available. A couple of weeks ago, I received a phone call followed by an email asking if I still wanted the information.

The Tasmanian stats are only surgical; however, the person directed me to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme to get the stats for RU486. You will find these all below.

I am now reluctant to go with the 88,000 (national) figure that keeps getting bandied about, because I don’t think this is accurate after seeing the figures below. 

We have a lot of hard work ahead of us if we want to change the tide on abortion.

Surgical abortions in Tasmania

The first table shows the number of surgical abortions in Tasmania over five years. This information was obtained from the Dept of Health Tasmania, under the Freedom of Information act.

Tasmania2020 – 20212021- 20222022 – 20232023 – 20242024 – 2025
Surgical Abortions453571688647667

Chemical abortions throughout Australia

The second table shows the number of RU486 prescriptions that were obtained over a five-year period, from 2021 – 2026. This information was obtained from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule Reports.

Item No:
10211K
Scheme
NSW
VICQLDSAWATASACTNTTotal
Services
PBS44,34650,34596,19816,62614,2895,05213853165231,406
RPBS2410302343278
2021-26Total44,37050,35596,2281662814,29250561,3883,167231,484

KEY: PBS – Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme / RPBS – Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

Pro-abortion professor withdraws controversial appointment at Catholic uni

The radical pro-abortion Professor Susan Ostermann has turned down a controversial appointment that sparked protests all around the United States, by students and pro-life activists alike. Professor Osterman was originally appointed as head of the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies at the Catholic Notre Dame University in South Bend, Indiana, but the backlash from many quarters has led to her rejecting the position.

From LifeNews

Radical pro-abortion Professor Susan Ostermann has declined the controversial appointment that has generated protests nationwide.

Ostermann has decided not to move forward as director of the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies at the University of Notre Dame, Keough School Dean Mary Gallagher announced in an email.

The decision came after mounting criticism for Ostermann’s abortion advocacy.

In a statement, Ostermann said: “At present, the focus on my appointment risks overshadowing the vital work the Institute performs, which should be allowed to continue without undue distraction.”

Read the rest at LifeNews.com

More ACT babies born alive after abortion

A recent Freedom of Information request in the ACT has revealed that there is an increasing number of babies being born alive after an abortion.

by Minny Jackson

Recent information obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request for data uncovered by ACT Right to Life has revealed troubling figures that deserve serious public attention and sober reflection. According to data drawn from a combined analysis of the Maternal & Perinatal Dataset Collection and the Perinatal Deaths Dataset, the number of neonatal deaths following termination of pregnancy in the Australian Capital Territory has increased steadily over the past decade.

The figures are as follows:

  • 2016-18: 19 neonatal deaths
  • 2019-21: 20 neonatal deaths
  • 2022-24: 27 neonatal deaths

These numbers, while small in absolute terms, represent a clear upward trend for the ACT. Behind every statistic is a human life that survived birth, however briefly, and then died. From a conservative and pro-life perspective, this raises profound moral, medical, and legal questions that cannot be brushed aside by euphemism or silence.

To be clear, neonatal death refers to the death of a baby after birth, typically within the first month of life. When such deaths occur following a termination of pregnancy, it means the child was born alive after an abortion. This reality alone should prompt careful scrutiny as it exposes the pitfalls of modern medicine, which is not infallible.

A society that claims to uphold compassion, dignity, and human rights must be willing to ask hard questions about how such outcomes occur and whether current laws and medical practices adequately protect the most vulnerable.

The other ethical question on the table is, why are doctors allowing this when babies born alive after a birth are classified as legal entities with the right to life?

Over the past decade, the ACT has moved towards one of the most permissive abortion regimes in the Western world. Termination has been fully decriminalised, gestational limits have been expanded, and oversight mechanisms have been reduced.

Pro-life advocates have long warned that removing legal guardrails does not eliminate ethical responsibility – it merely transfers enormous moral power to institutions with little transparency or public accountability, and it completely does away with the foundational principle of medicine, the Hippocratic Oath’s “Do no harm”.

The rising number of neonatal deaths following termination appears to coincide with this broader legal and cultural shift that has promoted abortion and denigrated the sanctity of life.

What is particularly concerning is the lack of public discussion around neonatal outcomes following termination. These deaths are largely invisible in public reporting and rarely addressed in parliamentary debate. Yet the data exists, is collected by government agencies, and now through FOI has been brought to light in Australia’s most woke state.

If a baby is born alive following a termination, that child is no longer hypothetical or abstract. That baby is a person before the law, and therefore a patient. He or she is a human being entitled to care, dignity, and protection, under the law. Any system that allows ambiguity around this reality risks eroding the most basic ethical principles of medicine.

There are also implications for women and families. Late-term terminations and neonatal loss can carry profound psychological and emotional consequences on mothers and families. A culture that presents abortion as a simple solution while minimising its complexity does a disservice to women, particularly when outcomes are traumatic or unexpected. Compassion must extend to both mother and child.

Conservatives have long argued that the role of government is to protect life, especially where individuals cannot protect themselves. Neonatal deaths following termination sit at the intersection of law, medicine, and morality. They challenge us to consider whether current frameworks genuinely reflect community values or whether they prioritise ideological convenience over human dignity and if so, what can be done to halt the descent of society into dystopian norms?

At a minimum, these figures justify:

  • Greater transparency in reporting neonatal outcomes.
  • An independent review of late-term termination practices.
  • Clear clinical guidelines to ensure infants live born receive appropriate care.
  • Parliamentary scrutiny rather than quiet administrative handling.

The data tells a story that cannot be ignored: more babies are being born alive following terminations and then dying in the neonatal period. Any society that claims to be humane must be willing to confront that truth honestly. If humanity wishes to “progress” collectively, then it ought to inquire into the reasons why death is increasing.

The measure of our civilisation is demonstrated by how we treat those with the least power. Neonatal children born at the margins of legality and visibility are society’s most vulnerable entities. They deserve more than silence. They deserve our attention, and they deserve a voice because they are not being heard when they are left in kidney dishes to die in a society that has normalised infanticide.

The time has come for the ACT to rise up against this kind of injustice, and demand answers for those who cannot speak for themselves.


Minny Jackson is Director of Advocacy at Christian Faith and Freedom Inc and is an author and researcher. Reprinted from News Weekly with permission.

Is abortion ever the right choice?

The successful pro-life organisation, Live Action has produced a downloadable e-book aimed at educating the public about the issue of abortion. Here is what Live Action has to say about the e-book:

Listen to the Stories of the Women Who’ve Been There

There are few issues as politically charged as the debate over abortion. As our nation considers the impact of reversing Roe v. Wade and allowing states to determine their own abortion restrictions, many are asking critical questions about the difficult cases pregnant women can face.

What about pregnancy resulting from sexual assault? How about women who are in a life-threatening pregnancy? Should abortion really be illegal in these situations?

Questions like these can be hard to answer, especially in the divisive climate of social media. However, there are answers out there. Especially when we take time to listen to the stories of the women who’ve been there and the doctors who’ve cared for them.

That’s why we took incredible stories from women and their doctors and compiled them together into this exclusive free eBook, Is Abortion Ever the Right “Choice.”

In it, you will hear unforgettable stories of courageous women and dedicated medical professionals. These stories will give you a clear-eyed understanding of abortion and its impact on everyone involved.

If you’d like a copy, please click here to go to the Live Action website and follow the instructions.

Concerned about your pregnancy or hurting after an abortion? Go to our pro-life supports page to find the help you need.

Amanda Stoker responds to the KAP abortion-gag rollback

Queensland MP, Bobbie Katter, of the Katter Australia Party, this week made an unsuccessful attempt to overturn the LNP government’s ban on abortion being debated in Parliament. Anne Sherston, President of the Human Life Protection Society, wrote to Queensland MP’s prior to the vote, expressing her support for Mr. Katter’s bold attempt. Only one response has been received so far: from Amanda Stoker, Member for Oodgeroo and Assistant Minister for Finance, Trade, Employment and Training.

Both Mrs Sherston’s letter and Ms. Stoker’s response are reproduced below.

As an Australian voter and the President of the Human Life Protection Society, Tasmania, I am writing to strongly urge you to take immediate action to overturn the gag order placed on pro-life members in the Queensland Parliament, twelve months ago. Although our organisation is based in Tasmania, this gag order affects all Australians.

Politicians need to be reminded that they have been elected to their positions by the Australian people. Politicians need to listen to all views and need to be able to discuss them in parliament freely. There should be no exceptions. If exceptions are being made, Australians are being denied from expressing their democratic values and rights. It is denying us from free speech.

The Australian public needs all our Members of Parliament to be able to speak freely about this critical issue and not fear repercussions.

The current restrictions are silencing a significant portion of the community in enabling them to express their beliefs and engage in a civil debate. I urge you to support Robbie Katter in overturning this gag order and allow freedom of speech. 

Your action can pave the way for a more open discussion on life-affirming measures in Queensland and the rest of Australia.

Anne Sherston, President HLPS


amanda stoker

Here is the response from Amanda Stoker:

Good afternoon,

Thank you for taking the time to write to me about this important issue.

I share your concern about the practice of allowing babies born alive after abortion to be left to die, and about the prevalence of abortion generally.  It is something I have stood against for many years, because all lives have value.

Be assured that I am advocating for Baby Samuel, and for all babies, within my team.   

You will be aware that the government made a commitment prior to the election that it would not change the law relating to abortion in this term.  Like all promises should, it will be kept. But I believe there remain opportunities to make a meaningful difference in policies that directly address the drivers of people choosing abortion by providing better support for families and vulnerable women facing unplanned pregnancy.

You may be interested to know that as a result of my determined and passionate advocacy the State Government in December 2025 funded a new service to provide wraparound residential support to women facing unplanned pregnancy.  It offers mental health support, parenting programs, health care for mother and baby and, if necessary, domestic violence assistance, so that vulnerable women have life-affirming choices available to them.  It will be delivered by Mercy Community as a pilot, and I am hopeful that it will make a positive impact for vulnerable women and their babies so we can make it available in more places.

This is the kind of family support that I truly believe drives down the hardship, alienation and vulnerability that drives women to seek abortion. 

You have expressed a desire to see me vote with Mr Katter, Labor and the Greens to open up the discussion of changes to the law relating to the termination of pregnancy in Queensland.  If you think that a deal to vote with Labor and the Greens – the architects of abortion to birth laws – is going to result in a rolling back of these laws, I respectfully suggest you are quite mistaken.  Sadly, Mr Katter has sold a narrative to some prominent pro-life voices that simply does not reflect the reality of the political environment.  Labor and the Greens want to open discussion of this subject for very different motives to those who care about human life, as they seek to drive pro-abortion policies further.   

I believe that for change on this front to really stick, a change in the law isn’t the easy answer some think it is.  We need a cultural change.  That requires support for people to have confidence to start a family, ensuring people are safe and supported for the task of parenting and appropriate education so that individuals are empowered to embrace life for themselves.  It means we have to address the human pain, fear and hardship that makes a person think abortion is their best or only option.  And while cultural change is slower, it is more enduring than legislation that Labor would not hesitate to change when next elected.  It is my sincere belief that this cultural change will make a deeper and longer-lasting impact for the unborn and their families.

I am committed to building a culture of valuing life in this state.  There is a long way to go. 

Thank you for writing to me.

Regards,

Amanda
Member for Oodgeroo (Cleveland)
Assistant Minister for Finance, Trade, Employment and Training

HLPS statement on Calvary hospital takeover

When the Hobart Private Hospital was bought by Catholic provider Calvary Health Care, there was an outcry over future access to some procedures, such as abortions, vasectomies, IVF, gender affirming surgery and assisted suicide.

Several news outlets covered the controversy, including the ABC and the Mercury (behind paywall).

Anne Sherston, President of the Human Life Protection Society, has responded to one such article which appeared in the Mercury; her letter was published in that publication on February 6th.

As President of the Human Life Protection Society in Tasmania, I am writing in response to the article “Access in Jeopardy,” by Judy Augustine, published in The Mercury on December 31, 2025.

Kelly Bruce, CEO of Women’s Health Tasmania, expressed concerns about women’s reproductive health in Tasmania, particularly the reduction of support for surgical terminations. This raises an important question: Why is abortion considered part of “reproductive health,” when the term “reproductive” means
producing new life?

What are people actually fearing? Is it that abortion is not going to be as easily accessible? Why are people so eager to make a human being so disposable?

CEO Kelly Bruce stated, “In practice, public hospitals really only provide surgical terminations up to 14 weeks, though there are some exceptions.”

Babies have been known to be born at 16 weeks. There should be no reason a baby needs to be aborted in a late-term pregnancy; caesarean needs to be the only option in these circumstances.

The fact that Calvary is a Catholic organisation would help uphold the values we should all hold dear. If Calvary is forced into allowing abortions, this would go against religious freedom.

Who are we to say who lives or dies when it comes to an unexpected pregnancy, or, for that matter, for someone who is near death? Not one person has the right to interfere with that. Regarding Voluntary Assisted Dying, there is no evidence that the existing safeguards are sufficient to prevent abuse.

When a woman has had an abortion, not only does the unborn baby die, but the woman’s spirit dies as well. This creates a list of numerous other issues and problems, starting with the mental health of the woman.

Family Planning Tasmania CEO Marcus Di Martino commented that
Pregnancy choices and empowering women to have control of their sexual and reproductive health are really important.” This being so important to women, more education needs to be provided to allow women to be completely informed of the choices they can be provided with, such as keeping the baby or
putting it up for adoption. The baby is innocent and the most vulnerable in this issue, and does not need to be aborted. An unborn baby, in fact, has “No Choice.”

We have enough babies being lost to abortion; we don’t need another facility to join the ranks.

Cancer and pregnancy: how a mother chose life for her baby

21 years ago, a Melbourne mother Tricia Colman received a devastating cancer diagnosis during her seventh pregnancy. She was offered an abortion but chose life for her child.

It was 2005, and Tricia arrived for her routine 20-week ultrasound. As it was her seventh child, Tricia wanted to know the gender and was happy to be told she was expecting a girl. She barely noticed when the attendant left the room to find the department head.

He came quickly and asked Tricia to get back onto the bed. The two medicos then discussed various tests and their results, and finally the senior man gave Tricia the news: a lump had been found on her kidney.

At first, Tricia saw no cause for alarm. She thought this was a minor development, perhaps just a cyst, and went home unperturbed.

That all changed after a call from her GP, who laid Tricia’s options on the line. She said that the discovery was a serious one — renal cell carcinoma — and that it may come down to saving the life of Tricia or her baby. She reminded Tricia that she had a husband and six other children to care for, yet Tricia was resolute.

“No harm will be done to my baby,” she told her doctor.

Tricia was given her records and referred to one of Monash Health’s hospitals in Melbourne. There, a second ultrasound showed that the lump on her kidney was now a 20 cm mass.

Later that day, when Tricia’s GP called with the results, Tricia jokingly asked her, “Should I get on my knees?”

Her doctor answered sombrely, “Your whole church needs to get on its knees.”

More specialist visits followed: one to a urologist who scheduled a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Again, the suggestion of abortion was mentioned and again, Tricia refused. The specialist told her the best path would be to deliver her baby early, and that the Obstetrics Department would want her to wait until 32 weeks.

At this point, the fast-growing tumour weighed more than Tricia’s baby. Most of the tests which would have normally been run at this time, as well as treatment for the cancer, were out of the question due to Tricia’s pregnancy. There was little to be done except praying, waiting — and for Tricia, planning for the arrival of her new baby.

On June 6, baby Imogen was born by caesarean section at 31 weeks, weighing 1.5 kg, while the tumour weighed a massive 1.7 kg! The doctors thought the tumour would have spread by that time and told Tricia she would need another surgery two weeks later to remove her kidney as well as her spleen.

Due to the surgery, medications, testing and recovery period, Tricia was never going to be able to breastfeed. Thankfully, a friend who had also just given birth donated milk to Imogen for three months.

With a lot of family support, Tricia was, over time, able to recover from her surgeries while managing her premature baby and was eventually given the all-clear from her cancer.

Tricia marvels at the fact that she experienced no symptoms from the kidney carcinoma, which is typical for that condition. She says, “I’m so grateful for Imogen because it was only due to the pregnancy that the tumour was detected. Had it not been for my baby, it wouldn’t have been discovered in time and I would not have survived.”

Tricia’s story underscores the fact that abortion is never medically necessary. With good care, some courage and a commitment to preserving the unborn child, it’s possible to achieve the outcome everyone wants — a healthy mother and a healthy baby.

This article first appeared at Endeavour Forum and is republished here by permission.

Mental health issues more common after abortion

The Christian Post: Women who have abortions face an “increased risk of mental health-related hospitalisation” compared to those who carry their pregnancies to term, according to a recent study.

Last month, the Journal of Psychiatric Research published a study by researchers with the University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, University of Sherbrooke and McGill University, titled “Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies.”

Researchers oversaw a retrospective cohort study of 28,721 induced abortions and approximately 1.22 million births at hospitals in Quebec, Canada, between 2006 and 2022.

They followed up with women after their pregnancies to identify any mental health-related hospitalizations to see if there was a link between induced abortion and hospitalisation.

According to the study, “abortion is associated with an increased risk of mental health-related hospitalization in the long term, but the association weakens with time.”

“Rates of mental health-related hospitalisation were higher following induced abortions than other pregnancies,” noted the report, adding that women who had abortions experienced higher rates of “substance use disorders” and “suicide attempts” when “compared with other pregnancies.”

“The associations were greater for patients who had preexisting mental illness,” or were younger than 25 at the time of their abortion.  

David Reardon, director of the Elliot Institute, a pro-life organisation, said in a statement released last week that the study was the most recent confirmation of a link between abortion and severe mental health problems.

“This is the latest in a string of record-based studies that do not suffer from any self-selection or recall bias. Plus, the authors fully controlled for women’s mental health histories before and after their abortions,” said Reardon.

“They found that prior mental health problems clearly magnify the risk that abortion will exacerbate the risk of a psychiatric crisis, but there [was] also elevated risks for women with no prior mental health issues.”

Reardon went on to note that while “it is difficult to know when, if ever, abortion may be the sole cause of any mental health problem,” it was also “ridiculous to assert that abortion never contributes to mental health issues.”

“We now know that the majority of abortion patients say that their abortions did negatively impact their mental health. To insist that abortion never impacts mental health is, essentially … an absurd, ideologically driven fantasy,” he added.

In 2023, BMC Psychiatry, an open-access, peer-reviewed journal, published an analysis of 15 papers that found, overall, 34.5% of women worldwide who had an abortion experienced depression.

“In conclusion, the occurrence of post-abortion depression has been observed to be widespread globally,” stated the 2023 study. “Healthcare providers should prioritize the provision of post-abortion counseling, care, and emotional support to women.”

This article first appeared at The Christian Post and is reproduced here under their Fair Use policy.